Economy

Marketing

Marketing strategies and tactics for growing your institution

Regulatory

Our perspective on the current regulatory and legislative topics impacting the industry

Strategy

Strategic ideas, thoughts and observations

Webinar

  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
(Please rate this post)
Loading ... Loading ...
Email Post Email Post | Print Post Print Post
Home » Checking, Raddon Research

What Type of Consumer Is More Likely To Make A Behavior Change to Avoid NSF/Overdraft Fees?

Submitted by The Raddon Report on Monday, July 12, 20103 Comments

LikelytoChangeFA09

RFG’s Fall 2009 research detailed a special cross tabulation between the behavior changes consumers have made to avoid NSF or overdraft fees and the lowest balance amount that their primary checking account reaches during a typical month. 

High-balance checking account holders ($1K or more) are significantly more likely to report that they have not made any behavior changes when managing their checking and/or debit card account.  In contrast, low balance checkers ($500 or less) are more likely to report that they check account balances online regularly.

To order the full report, click here.

About RFG’s national consumer research

Financial institutions receive national consumer research through RFG’s Strategic Planning Study Group (SPSG), a marketing research program consisting of semi-annual consumer surveys on current industry topics derived from RFG’s research process.

Based upon 1,155 survey responses of a randomly drawn sample of members of a nationally representative direct mail panel, the consumer responses used in this study were weighted to reflect the nation’s demographic composition. The study’s confidence interval for any proportion gathered in the survey is in a range of 1.7% to 2.9% at the 95% level of confidence.

For more information about RFG’s national consumer research, visit www.raddon.com/spsg.

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Technorati
(Please rate this post)
Loading ... Loading ...
| Comments (RSS) |

3 Comments »

  • Jeffry Pilcher | TheFinancialBrand.com said:

    This study was based on respondents’ stated changes, not the actual changes in their behaviors, correct?

    Did the study separate those who have incurred NSF charges from those who haven’t, or is the entire population lumped together? Personally speaking, I’ve made “No Changes,” but that’s also because I haven’t paid an NSF fee in over 10 years.

  • Dan McGowan said:

    Jeffry: Thanks for the question. The study is based on consumer responses to a national survey — not their actual transaction behavior. The chart above does not separate consumers that have incurred an NSF; however, we do have that information in the complete study.

  • Jeffry Pilcher | TheFinancialBrand.com said:

    Thanks for the reply Dan.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.